Professionalism is one of the basic factors to look out for in a drug rehab center. The center must have provisions for professional counseling, professional staff, and programs that are professionally tested and proven to work. A drug rehab center must possess a good market reputation. What other people say concerning a rehab center will either attract potential customer or chase them away. A person who goes through the programs of a rehab center must emerge victorious and be able to overcome addictions, whether substance or alcohol.
Read through every success stories of people who have gone through rehabilitation centers. Choose the rehab center with the highest number of success stories. Seek value for your money and not just any kind of services. Quality programs and facilities must be part of what you should be looking for. You must also be careful about the after care services that are offered by the center to avoid a relapse. Do not fall for any drug rehab center that does not offer this kind of services. They are extremely crucial for any person who is recovering from drug or alcohol addiction. They help a person to beat any temptation of a relapse especially when they are out of the rehab center.
How To Choose A Drug Rehab Center
Most families that have drug addicts find it hard to come to terms with the fact. When they live in denial, they may not be able to help the patient. But as soon as they accept the situation, they will strive to find ways to see the person through a drug rehab. The first step is to find out varying services offered by different rehab centers, the quality of doctors on service and comments from clients. It is important to ask the success rate of a particular center as chancing on any center may lead to loss of valuable time and resources.
Next, it is necessary to find treatment services offered as different drug rehab centers have varying treatment methods. Of course, recovery time depends on the method used at the rehab center, that is why, it is important to go to a place where you are sure your funds and the patient’s time will not be wasted. The only way to help an addict is to find the right treatment center that is able to create sobriety in them. Therefore, a lot of time and consideration has to be put to place so that a patient does not relapse to their old ways.
Thanks to the internet and streaming media, it is now extremely easy to find relaxation techniques for anxiety. When you know that you need to keep your anxiety levels down and manage your work and home life in perfect equanimity, you will know that you need help. Find a reputable expert’s site and go through as many videos on relaxation techniques for anxiety as possible. You will soon be able to discern the good from the bad and start practicing based on the advice of a few good ones. After a little while, you will have found a few of the techniques that work best for you and you can stick with those. This type of research and selection will take very little of your time and that is time well spent.
Of course, you can consider yoga or tai chi if you want those types of relaxation techniques for anxiety. It is a matter of finding some that suit your temperament and your lifestyle. All it needs is your realization that you need some help in managing your stress levels. Once you are fully aware of this fact, you will be drawn to various sources of knowledge that can help you.
Teach Youngsters About Overcoming Panic Attacks
Teenagers go through many changes and all of them require some level of support from the school as well as family. This is also the time when situations arise that can cause these panic attacks. It could be related to the tests or to the social peer pressure. This is probably the best time to teach them about overcoming these attacks. Like anything else, you catch the problem immediately and design a suitable solution. If high schools are able to deal with it positively, you might find these teenagers grow into adults with a lot more confidence than they would otherwise. As part of this process, if the guidance counselor could initiate a course on overcoming panic attacks, it would be best. Of course, school boards must be supportive.
Singling out an individual might announce the problem to the world and the teenager might not be happy about that. But, if it were to be addressed to a classroom full of similarly plagued children, it might be more effective. Those that actually need it might continue practicing the techniques that taught them about overcoming panic attacks. Once you’ve answered the question “how can a person stop panic attacks”, the solutions come more clear (especially with well informed resources) It is important to acknowledge this need and admit that it is a growing concern among children as well as adults.
Acid reflux can be a very serious medical condition, and it usually affects the esophagus. Simply put, the person suffering from this condition usually have their acid going up from their stomach, and many experts think it may be connected to snoring as well. However, in some cases, using some anti snoring products does not help, no matter what the reviews say.
Acid reflux and snoring medications can be used daily, even before the problems occur, and they usually involve some herbal alternatives. But make no mistake, the condition is very serious. Nevertheless, if the problem exists, the doctor will prescribe something stronger that can also take away the pain this condition is causing. On the other hand, even the lifestyle changes can help, and doctors recommend avoiding the red meat and fats that can trigger the problem, but the high alkaline food should be used in diet. Any type of food with a high pH factor can lead to more troubles, so the balanced diet is a must. Once the patient gets rid of acid flux, the snoring may disappear, as well. If not, then many devices may help, such as mouthpieces, and in order to find out more about them, it is recommended to read a Good Morning Snore Solution review.
Where Are The Best Snore RX Reviews?
In most cases to do with health, companies solicit the endorsements from medical professionals. The same could have been done in the case of the Snore RX reviews. This is because one wants authenticity in what you find on the internet. Somehow, you feel that when you are reading the words from a doctor, you tend to take it seriously. This is true of the best snore RX reviews when they are written by a medical professional. It would be against their belief system to recommend a health product by embellishing the truth or by ignoring all the aspects of some product.
One hopes that these reviews have been written and published only after the medical professional has verified all the claims and can recommend it as seriously as he would any other type of medication. There is an implied assurance that can only come from a doctor. It need not seem an empty endorsement. This is probably why advertisers always target the professionals of the same industry to recommend or endorse a particular product. This is not necessarily the same as fooling the public. It is just that a professional’s word always carries more weight than that of a lay person.
Good Morning Snore Solution Vs ZQuiet
Choosing the best stop snoring product is not an easy task, especially because all manufacturers will say anything in order to sell the product. The best way to learn the truth is reading the reviews, so in this article the reader will see what the users say in the ZQuiet and the Good Morning Snore Solution review, and which one is better to use.
The Zquiet lets the user sleep normally, the way he is used to, and it corrects the jaw the better way. It is very easy to use, affordable for anyone, and it is made in one size that can fit everyone. When it comes to downsides, the Zquiet can cause drooling, so it can be a bit embarrassing to use. It must be maintained regularly, and many reviews say it can be damaged easily, so it must be replaced from time to time. The Good Morning Snore Solution is very safe to use, and it is approved by the FDA, so many doctors recommend it. It is not too expensive, but the best thing is that it comes with money back guarantee, so it proves its credibility. However, in another Good Morning Snore Solution review one may see this product can also cause drooling problems, and many users find it hard to get used to.
CAFFEINE is addictive. This has been known for some time, but more evidence has emerged that it is seriously addictive in that it can produce severe withdrawal symptoms. This is perhaps bad news for coffee drinkers, for tea drinkers (tea contains some caffeine) and for Coca-Cola drinkers. Perhaps. However, the real question is whether addiction does you any harm.
The trouble with talking about addiction is that most people, especially the puritans and the wowsers, automatically treat addiction as bad. Moreover, it tends to be treated as something that is a danger to all or a large proportion of the population. However, it is perfectly possible that there are some addictions which are harmless. More importantly, and very relevant to the still-growing campaign against smoking, the substance of addiction may not necessarily be inextricably wound up in the dangerous aspects of the usual manner of consumption.
There has been a lot of talk about the addictive nature of nicotine in the context of the United States Congress and its current McCarthyite hearings into the tobacco industry. The chief executives of the major tobacco companies were lined up in front of the congressional committee, and asked one by one whether they believed that nicotine was addictive.
They in effect “took the fifth” – as people accused of membership of the Communist Party in the McCarthy days pleaded the right of non-self-incrimination under the fifth amendment to the US constitution – and declared that they did not believe that it was. Of course they had to do this; an admission would have laid them open to devastating litigation.
Nicotine is almost certainly addictive. The real harm done by smoking has little to do with the nicotine itself, but the products associated with it. It would seem sensible for anyone who was addicted to nicotine, and who wanted to give up smoking, to separate the two issues. Nicotine patches are one means to achieve this; so are nicotine chewing gums and other tobacco products like snuff. However, these are all either illegal or tightly controlled.
It would seem sensible from a non-moralistic point of view that if the genuine harm of smoking were what the anti-smoking lobby was really on about they would promote two alternative approaches. One would be to encourage the use of nicotine products which give the benefits of that drug, but did not deliver the harm of smoking. A convenient nicotine pill would be a good idea (apparently the main problem with chewing gum and so on is that they do not deliver an effective and sufficient hit).
Another would be to encourage research into alternative drugs which provided the same satisfactions and benefits as nicotine, without having any harmful side effects. It would not matter then if these alternatives were addictive. The nature of addiction is the essence of the problem. The latest issue of the New Scientist devotes a considerable amount of space to the difficulties of defining addiction, and determining its causes. It seems that addiction is always a minority problem – the greater number of people can genuinely “take it or leave it alone” in the cases of nicotine and alcohol, as well as heroin, cannabis and many other drugs.
There is clearly a strong genetic element in the predisposition to addiction. There is a lot of research still to be done into the mechanisms of addiction, and questions such as the extent to which addiction is “learnt” by the body, and whether once learnt is ever reversible, are still open. Then there is the question of whether substances that mimic addictive drugs, or effectively block the receptors for the stimulus they provide, are of any use. The essential point is that many people need and want drugs of addiction. (There is the famous phrase which I have heard applied to a Nobel prize-winning economist – he “was born two whiskies below par”.) The pleasure of drug use is essential to them, and they will seek it one way or another. Religion is, of course, a drug to many people, and often far more harmful than physiological addiction, and yet is frequently recommended as an alternative. This fits the pattern of disapproval which underlies most approaches to drug addiction or habituation. There are clearly psychological and social aspects to drug use as well as physiological aspects.
For example, the heavy use of vodka in Russia is perfectly understandable in terms of the history of that tortured country. Probably alcoholism is a far more rational response to the awfulness of life there than either revealed or political religion. The trouble with most approaches to the health problems associated with smoking, drinking, or other drug use is that the issue is so imbued with moralism. This is worst in doctors since they are so accustomed to seeing the disasters which addiction produces among the minority of the population which is prone to addiction, and few of them are able to understand the difference between moral disapproval of addiction and the harm done by addictive substances.
One view cited in the New Scientist is that of Alan Leshner, director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse in Bethesda, Maryland, that “addiction is not a failure of will or morality, but a chronic brain disease that should be ranked alongside schizophrenia and Tourette’s syndrome”.
If the real harm of smoking were the primary motive of the anti-smoking lobby, one would expect that they would be devoting a large proportion of their funding to research into relatively harmless ways of obtaining and using nicotine. The same applies to alcohol. It is perfectly obvious that a large contributor to the overuse of alcohol is the psychological needs of the drinker. This is true even of those who cannot be said to be physiologically dependent. Why not, then, concentrate on discovering an acceptable and palatable alternative drug for those who need alcohol, as distinct from enjoying it in the form of its delivery (like good wine or cold beer) and the social lubrication that it provides?
This could then be used as a supplement by those who would otherwise be tempted or inclined to overuse alcohol. The general problem of alcohol and powerful and psychotropic drugs is not going to go away. Prohibition may save some people – there is evidence that in the United States prohibition markedly reduced the use of alcohol – but cannot prevent the use of drugs, legal and illegal, of all kinds especially by those prone to addiction. The illegality is the main source of the criminality that which surrounds drug use. And as for the addictive nature of coffee – that is a small problem which will be easily dealt with once it is generally understood – unless the wowsers now decide that they should campaign to make coffee illegal or at least a prescription drug. I have noticed that in countries where good coffee is served at high strength, people tend to use it wisely and in moderation. Much the same applies to alcohol – the problem resides with those people who resort to the crudest varieties in desperation. Addiction is not the real problem.
Monica glanced first toward Francine, her 7-year-old daughter, lying on the family room floor, drawing pictures of dismembered adults. Her eyes then darted to Andre, her new husband of two years, who stood in front of the TV, engrossed in the evening newscast.
Why is this still bothering me? Monica mused to herself I’ve talked with Mom and friends about it, but .. Staring through the sliding-glass doors leading to the patio, Monica mumbled, “I wonder if professional counseling would help?”
Monica’s experience is that of many who face mental or behavioral health dilemmas. They want to know when to seek help, what to expect, and where to get psychological counseling. Here’s some help for those exploring the mental health care scene.
Should I, or shouldn’t I? Many people are hesitant to seek mental health services because they’re not sure when a behavior, feeling, or way of thinking is no longer normal.
“If what you’ve tried isn’t working, or if you’re not certain you are coping adequately with a situation, then you should realize that something isn’t what it should be. Not knowing for sure and being unable to admit that a problem exists often keeps people from getting counseling,” says Juliana M. Harrison, M.S.W., L.I.S.W., child welfare supervisor for Franklin County Children’s Services in Ohio. “Pride can be the big test barrier.”
Having your concerns validated by someone you trust and who is objective can help you make a decision about counseling. For instance, Monica’s concern about her daughter’s peculiar drawings and way of communicating with family members is shared by her teacher. Her teacher notes that her school achievement and behavior are less like a 7-year-old and more like a preschooler. In this case, further exploration with a mental health provider would be warranted, according to Harrison.
Realizing a need for outside help can be a good rationale for adults to seek professional counseling for themselves.
“I went into counseling when I wanted the viewpoint of someone objective, someone not directly involved,” says Cenan, a young adult transitioning from a high school to college. “I wanted to know who I was.”
Troubling thoughts, emotions, and behaviors that in their extreme are considered “mental illness” are not the only conditions that can benefit from psychotherapy. A desire for enhanced understanding of personal and interpersonal issues, as in Cenan’s case, are also appropriate reasons. “Counseling is a great place to find out what you want in life or from a relationship,” comments Cenan.
What to expect. Once you decide to enter counseling, being unfamiliar with what will take place can be the next barrier. Since relatively few of the estimated 34 million people who are in psychotherapy talk openly about their experience, the social stigma persists.
“You should expect to be treated respectfully by a provider who will listen to your story. A lot of questions will be asked of you in order to get a good picture of who you are and your situation. Also, you need not expect that if you go once, it means you have to go 20 times. A competent provider will help you determine realistic expectations,” says psychiatrist Donna Scott, M.D., director of the Southern Crescent Psychiatry and Counseling Center in Newnan, Georgia.
However, don’t expect that complex, distressed situations will be reversed quickly. “Working through problems takes time. They didn’t form overnight,” adds Harrison. Resolution can be anything but instantaneous.
What persons in therapy can expect from themselves can sometimes be quite surprising. “I struggled with not wanting to trust the counselor or the process, and not allowing myself to feel worse on the way to getting better. That was really hard! But once I discovered that I was going to get out of it what I put into it–that the therapist wasn’t going to give me advice–I really started to work,” commented Cenan, as she reflected on her two-year experience in psychotherapy.
Perhaps the most perplexing part of counseling is determining progress. Dr. Scott admits that knowing that the treatment is working can be challenging. “This is where having specific goals at the outset is helpful.” You can know it’s working if “you are working toward getting better; not necessarily that it is all better.”
When you are dealing with deepseated, painful issues, then “working toward” can be a significant improvement. “Looking for baby steps when it seemed like nothing was happening became very important to me,” says Cenan.
For example, Monica’s husband, Andre, is considering stopping his individual therapy, which has included medication as well as counseling. Monica agrees because even though Andre’s anxiety attacks have decreased noticeably, he still does not seem interested in her or Francine. “The drugs make him not care about anything,” Monica complains.
However, the couple may be expecting too much. Addressing one issue, anxiety, will not necessarily solve the other couple- or family-related conflicts. “If they are really seeking help, then the family as a system should be looked at. The treatment may be individual or include some or all of the family,” says Harrison.
Where medication is involved, particular care is needed. “You need to have a clear idea of what the medication is for”–and not for–”and its side effects,” says Scott. “A thorough explanation of the hoped-for outcome and a timeline are a must.” Parents especially should know the danger of taking children off medication just because they “thought he’s doing better,” adds Harrison.
Where to turn. Where to get started is the most perplexing part of the mental health care question for some who have artfully navigated the when” and “what” of psychological counseling. The choice of a clinician is sometimes made based on maintaining privacy. “For some it’s a question of `Where can I go so no one will know?”‘ says Harrison.
While confidentiality is important, Hariison recommends beginning where you are comfortable. “Start with a trusted health-care provider or friend who has had success with the counseling community. And don’t worry so much about the type of provider-psychologist, social worker, psychiatrist, or counselor,” adds Scott.
Also, use the clergy as both a referral and treatment source. “Pastoral counseling is legitimate, as many clerics are getting more training and doing more than just giving Scripture. The wholistic perspective–encompassing the spiritual as well as the physical, social, and psychologicalis gaining in popularity in our society,” cites Harrison.
“People who believe in God have a strength others don’t,” observes Scott. They often want to capitalize on this as they seek wholeness. Persons who are spiritual may want to locate a mental health care provider who is open to the operation of the divine in human affairs. As renown psychiatrist Karl Menninger said, “I treat, but God heals.”
If you had an abusive childhood, get over it. How much simpler than spending months or years exploring and understanding these issues in order to solve them. Laura does it all in few minutes: just long enough to assign blame.
Though the predicaments her listeners bring run the gamut of human problems, Laura’s advice rings but a single note: She offers a simplistic morality, Dr. Laura proclaims that the right ethical choice is easy. Again and again she condemns her listeners for putting their immediate expediency before their values; for blinding themselves to their own weaknesses; for whining about having chosen the wrong partner. She takes a tough stance toward others, but how about towards Doctor Laura herself? By calling herself Doctor Laura, Schlessinger allows her listeners to believe that she speaks with the authority of a psychologist or psychiatrist. Her only doctorate, however, is in physiology. Though this may not constitute a punishable infraction of the profession’s legal code, it is, at the very least, ethically questionable.
If she were just one more neurotic, self-aggrandizing therapist, Laura would merely be a sitcom character. But there is a dangerous price paid for her astounding success. Laura draws her listeners by toying with their hunger to believe that for all their personal pain and confusion and the suffering they see around them, their world is comprehensible, just, and moral. Laura’s self-righteous indignation plays on a universal hope for a moral universe, a hope that becomes more desperate as society turns its back on its own moral obligation to help those in need. The truth is that the less humane our society gets, the more need we feel to justify its authority. Just as children of abusive parents find it less threatening to blame themselves than their parents, people who suffer the most are first to blame themselves for their pain. The victim – and victims almost universally believe they must deserve their suffering – complies with the injustice.
People call Laura because they are in pain and need help, but they also believe that they don’t deserve to be helped. Thus when Laura twists the knife a little deeper into a suffering caller, blaming the victim, she absolves the rest of us for a moment from our own guilt. She also confirms our belief that we don’t really deserve help. She constantly reminds us that “God helps those who help themselves.” But what about the helpless? The price of her absolution is that we too turn our backs on those in need, and, at the same time, deny our own inner cries for help. Every problem is an occasion for swift response – something to be eliminated, not understood. Her anti-psychological rapier slashes through our Gordian tangle of guilt but leaves us scarred in the process.
Laura’s enormous popularity bolsters a widespread and disturbing movement in our country to trivialize psychological problems. Her powerful appeal mirrors two prevailing and dangerous deceptions. First is the mistaken belief that emotional problems are, on the whole, malingering or a result of moral laxity. Many of her callers may share Laura’s scorn for complex psychological explanations, but they still suffer from failed relationships and yearn for love and community. They feel bad and they turn to Laura for help they are not sure they deserve. Laura’s smug piety affirms the possibility of a better life if they’ll only accept full personal blame for their problems. Their guilt over their own suffering leaves them exquisitely susceptible to Laura’s attacks.
The second deception Laura’s success feeds on is that long term psychotherapy is ineffective. It has become an oft-repeated and acceptable deceit that psychotherapy is mere quackery; this position is upheld not only by the uneducated, but is gaining acceptance in cynical academic circles as reflected in the writings of Frederick Crews and Jeffrey Masson. Laura encourages her listeners to believe that her invectives and platitudes are the best help they can hope for, and that the expense of real psychotherapy is a self-indulgence – a waste of time and money.
Now it is true that not all therapists are equally good, but the truth is that there is an enormous body of reputable research that confirms that psychotherapy and psychiatry are remarkably effective treatments for the entire gamut of emotional problems. In an extensive survey organized by Consumer Reports, over 90 percent of those who used the services of a psychotherapist for problems ranging from everyday unhappiness to severe mental illness said that they were helped. Contradicting Laura’s contempt for long-term psychotherapy, the survey confirmed that those who stayed in therapy the longest were helped the most. Further studies show that, on the whole, psychotherapy is often more effective than many other common medical interventions. Even the most serious mental illnesses respond to a combination of therapy and psychopharmacology: for many it may come as a surprise that these treatments are about 80 percent effective in treating manic depression, depressive disorders, and panic attacks; even the success rate for treating schizophrenia is 60 percent. Depressive disorders respond equally well, in the long run, to psychotherapy with or without medication. Compare that to the improvement rates of heart treatments such as angioplasty and atherectomy at 41 and 52 percent respectively. How sad then that many people’s only experience with psychotherapy is the radio ravings of Dr. Laura, and that they have to settle for her platitudes rather than get real assistance.
Not too surprisingly, undermining our faith in psychotherapy is even more popular with the health insurance industry than with disaffected intellectuals. The for-profit managed care business that is currently cannibalizing our communities must be overjoyed by Laura’s popularity. Populist cynicism toward psychotherapy allows health insurance companies to redline psychological problems and provides them with a shortsighted windfall. Health insurance companies are delighted by anyone who can convince us that psychological problems are self-indulgent malingering. After all, psychotherapy can take a long time, and health insurance companies like to treat even major surgery on an outpatient office-visit budget. Laura’s instant “treatment” bolsters their strategy to trivialize mental illness and deny coverage for long-term treatment. Insurance companies thrive on our belief that there is no real help for our pain. But we foot the bill since the quality of life for all of us has been savaged. For most, denial of psychotherapy results merely in unnecessary unhappiness and frustration, but, ultimately, for society as a whole, the costs are far greater: Families are shattered by untreated mental illness. Our schools have become combat zones. Our streets teem with those too disabled even to beg. Our jails and courts are choked.
These are some of the costs of conflating psychology and morality. Once psychological problems are depicted as moral failings, the issue becomes punishment, not treatment. As we close our hearts and minds to the possibilities of rehabilitation and redemption, people with untreated psychological problems fall within the province of the criminal justice system. In fact, mental hospitals have been replaced by prisons; and right now L.A. County Jail is the largest mental health facility in California.